RFK Jr.'s First HHS Confirmation Hearing: 7 Healthcare Takeaways

Becker’s Hospital Review
 
President Donald Trump's HHS secretary pick Robert F. Kennedy Jr. faced more than three hours of questioning by the Senate Finance Committee Jan. 29, the first of two hearings this week in an effort to secure the nomination. 

Wednesday's hearing covered a range of health topics, from vaccine mandates to rural hospital closures and plans for Medicare and Medicaid. Mr. Kennedy faces another hearing Jan. 30 with the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. 

Here are seven takeaways and excerpts from the hearing. A recording of the hearing in full can be found here.

  1. Medicare and Medicaid: There were nearly 80 mentions of Medicaid, about 40 mentions of Medicare and only five mentions of Medicare Advantage throughout the Senate Finance Committee hearing.

The focus on Medicaid came one day after widespread disruptions to the program's portals and confusion about the program's inclusion in the Trump administration's plans to freeze an array of federal funds, grants and programs. This became a point of contention, with Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., claiming the Trump budget office shut down the federal Medicaid payment portal, while Committee Chairman Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, countered that reports of disruptions were "proven false overnight," asserting that the portal was fully operational at the time of the hearing.

Sen. Bill Cassidy, MD, R-La., pressed Mr. Kennedy about his plans to reform Medicare and Medicaid, which collectively provide health coverage to more than 150 million Americans.  At times, Mr. Kennedy's comments indicated confusion between the two programs. When asked about integrating Medicare and Medicaid for dual-eligible individuals, he inaccurately described Medicaid as being "fully paid for by the federal government," when in fact it is funded jointly by state and federal governments.

Mr. Kennedy suggested that most people are unhappy with federal health programs, and stated several times throughout the hearing that Medicaid premiums and deductibles are too high. A relatively small portion of Medicaid beneficiaries pay premiums and deductibles, however. He did not confirm whether he supports adding work requirements for Medicaid coverage or cuts to the program, though suggested improvements are needed. "I don't have a broad proposal for dismantling the program," Mr. Kennedy said. 

A KFF poll conducted in 2023 found strong satisfaction with federal insurance programs, with 91% of Medicare beneficiaries and 83% of Medicaid enrollees rating their coverage positively.

Despite its prominence in previous policy discussions, Medicare Advantage received little attention during the hearing. One of its few mentions came when Mr. Kennedy disclosed that he is personally enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan. "Most Americans like myself, I'm on Medicare Advantage and I'm very happy with it," he said during an exchange with Mr. Cassidy about Medicare and Medicaid…

Read Full Article

 

Centene, Aetna, Kaiser Lead in Medicare Advantage Denials: KFF

Modern Healthcare / By Nona Tepper

Aetna, Centene and Kaiser Permanente denied at least one in 10 Medicare Advantage prior authorization requests in 2023, according to a KFF analysis published Tuesday. 

Across the industry, Medicare Advantage insurers increased their use of prior authorization by 7.8% to 49.8 million total requests in 2023, the health policy think tank determined using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data. The increase in requests is in line with enrollment growth, KFF said. Insurers denied slightly fewer prior authorization requests in 2023, refusing to cover 6.8% of claims compared with 7.4% in 2022. 

Related: Medicare Advantage prior authorization, marketing limits proposed

Legislators and regulators have called out the use of prior authorization in Medicare Advantage in recent years as a growing number of policyholders report confronting barriers to care, particularly in post-acute settings.

People in their last year of life were more than twice as likely to switch from Medicare Advantage to traditional Medicare over care access concerns, according to a 2021 report by the Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General. Those switching from Medicare Advantage to traditional Medicare cost the federal government 27% more than those who were continuously enrolled in the fee-for-service program, KFF reported in December. At the same time, CMS has fined insurance companies for exaggerating patient conditions to improperly inflate federal reimbursements…

Read Full Article

 

Yes, the Pain Is All in Your Head

Medscape / By F. Perry Wilson

Welcome to Impact Factor, your weekly dose of commentary on a new medical study. I’m Dr F. Perry Wilson from the Yale School of Medicine.

I’ve been thinking about Dune a lot lately. I think I might be the only person in the world who prefers the bizarre and grotesque David Lynch movie version to the elegantly crafted Villeneuve oeuvre, including David Lynch himself. We lost a real artist with his passing, and a rewatch of Twin Peaks is very much on my to-do list for this winter.

But back to Dune, because one of the pivotal scenes in the novel and both movie versions is one where young Paul Atreides is tested by the Machiavellian Bene Gesserit. Atreides has to put his hand in a box. What is inside? Pain. Ever increasing pain. He must keep his hand in the box, despite all his instincts telling him to pull it out to prove his fundamental humanity — his ability to exercise control over his own instincts.

Because, as the Reverend Mother points out after the ordeal, his hand is unharmed. The pain is a fabrication — pain by nerve induction, she says. There is no physical damage. It’s all in his mind.

And, of course, that’s true of all pain, isn’t it? It’s not your toe that hurts when you stub it. Signals are sent from your toe, up a nerve to your spinal cord, up another nerve to your thalamus, and then onto the cortex to give it context, emotion, intensity, reality. If that chain is broken, pain simply does not occur. It’s all in your mind.

That’s what makes pain so difficult to treat. It is fundamentally subjective. I’ve had patients with wounds that would make me scream for my mother, yet they sat stoically silent while we worked on them. And I’ve had those who, well, seemed like they were hamming it up a bit…

Read Full Article

 

Trump’s Initial Orders Reverse Biden on Health Care Costs, Protections from Discrimination

Stat News | By Sarah Owermohle, John Wilkerson, Rachel Cohrs Zhang, and Lizzy Lawrence
 
WASHINGTON — President Trump began his second term Monday with a sweeping order aimed at reversing dozens of former President Biden’s top priorities, from regulations aimed at lowering health care costs, to coronavirus outreach, Affordable Care Act expansions, and protections against gender-based discrimination. 
 
The “initial rescissions” order, signed in front of cheering crowds at the Capital One Arena, revokes dozens of Biden administration policies that the new White House called inflammatory, inflationary, and possibly illegal. They include an October 2022 order to test Medicare and Medicaid models that could lower health care costs, an extension, Biden said, of his administration’s signature achievement to negotiate drug prices in the Inflation Reduction Act. 
 
Trump is also peeling back certain Biden administration efforts to expand access to Covid-19 treatments and vaccines, the 2021 formation of a Gender Policy Council, and multiple gender and sex discrimination protections. He ordered federal workers to return to their offices full time, and he froze federal hiring, with some exceptions.
 
Separately, Trump ordered the U.S. to begin the process of withdrawing from the World Health Organization, which he blames for mishandling the Covid-19 pandemic.
 
Trump’s broad proclamations, like any president’s executive orders, generally begin the process of regulations and rulemaking at federal agencies. The reversals could meet legal challenges or congressional intervention. Several of Biden’s orders were tied to laws 
passed by Congress…

Read Full Article

 

How the Incoming Trump Administration Could Impact Home-Based Care

Home Health Care News | By Jim Parker

Questions always abound when a new presidential administration comes in, but Republicans’ focus on cost-cutting hold potential for home-based care — if providers can advocate for themselves in Washington. 

Though uncertainties abound when it comes to the Trump administration’s approach to health care, many notable policies have been implemented during Republican administrations. From the establishment of the Medicare Hospice Benefit under Ronald Reagan to the unveiling of Programs for All-Inclusive Care of the Elderly (PACE) under the first Bush administration, this track record can be source of optimism, according to Edo Banach, partner at Manatt Health, a division of the law firm Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP.

“The optimistic note is that a lot of the positive things that have happened in health care over the last 30 years have happened under a Republican Congress, a Republican administration or both,” Banach told Home Health Care News. “I think we’re going to see an increase in opportunities when it comes to caring for vulnerable folks, people who have Medicare and Medicaid, people who are chronically and seriously ill. If the incoming administration wants to solve an economic problem, they can’t solve an economic problem without solving that problem. You’re not going to save money if you simply cut services, so you have to be smarter about the way that you deploy those services.”

Banach previously served as deputy director and senior leader at the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) during the Obama administration.

A key component of this is the Republican drive to cut costs, particularly as it pertains to the Medicare trust fund. Home-based care has a proven track record of reducing the total cost of care, which could lead to increased government investment in those services.

Hospice is a great example. Hospice care saves Medicare roughly $3.5 billion for patients in their last year of life, according to a joint report from the National Alliance for Care at Home and NORC at the University of Chicago.

Likewise, participants in the home health value-based purchasing model (HHVBP) have saved Medicare more than $1.38 billion over six years in nine states, according to CMS.

The same principle extends to palliative care. Home-based palliative care could reduce societal health care costs by $103 billion within the next 20 years, the nonprofit economic research group Florida TaxWatch said in a 2019 report

Read Full Article

 
<< first < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > last >>

Page 3 of 386